English
English
MIKAYIL MAMMADOV v. AZERBAIJAN (Application no. 4762/05)
BUDAYEVA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA (Applications nos. 15339/02, 21166/02, 20058/02, 11673/02 and 15343/02)
Relying on Articles 2 (right to life), 8 (right to respect for private and family life), 13 (right to an effective remedy) and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (protection of property), the applicants alleged that, as a result of the Russian authorities’ failure to mitigate the consequences of the mudslides from 18 to 25 July 2000, the authorities put their lives at risk and were responsible for the death of Mr Budayev and the destruction of their homes. They also complained under Article 2 that the authorities failed to carry out a judicial enquiry into the disaster.
English
HASAN ÝLHAN v. TURKEY (Application n. 22494/93)
Hasan İlhan alleged, in particular, that his home and its contents, vineyards and orchards had been burned down and destroyed by members of the security forces. He also maintained that his home and possessions were destroyed because he was of Kurdish origin. He relied on Articles 3, 6, 8, 13, 14 and 18 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.
The Court held, unanimously, that there had been:
- a violation of Article 3 (prohibition of inhuman treatment) of the European Convention on Human Rights;
English
KALANYOS AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA (Application no. 57884/00)
The case involves criminal arson of houses belonging to Roma and authorities' failure to prevent the attack and make a proper criminal investigation.
English
KESER AND OTHERS v. TURKEY (Applications nos. 33238/96 and 32965/96)
According to the applicants, in 1994, the Turkish security forces expelled the inhabitants of a village suspected of "aiding and abetting terrorists" of the PKK. According to the Turkish government, the security forces were actually terrorists disguised as policemen.
English
Collective complaint FEANTSA v. the Netherlands (86/2012)
In July 2012, FEANTSA lodged a collective complaint against The Netherlands alleging that The Netherlands' legislation, policy and practice regarding sheltering the homeless is not compatible with Articles 13 (right to social and medical assistance), 16 (right of the family to social, legal and economic protection), 17 (right of children and young persons to social, legal and economic protection), 19 (right of migrant workers and their families to protection and assistance), 30 (right to protection against poverty and social exclusion), 31 (right to housing), taken a
English
Collective Complaint FEANTSA v. Slovenia (53/2008)
FEANTSA’s complaint against Slovenia built on the experienced gained from successfully filing a housing-based Complaint against France two years earlier (FEANTSA v. FRANCE, CC39/2006).
English
Pages
- « first
- ‹ previous
- 1
- 2
- 3
